Negarse a hablar
La ética del silencio animal y el sacrificio en Coetzee y Derrida
Keywords:
Coetzee, Derrida, animals, sacrifice, silence, ethicsAbstract
J.M. Coetzee's Elizabeth Costello interprets animal silence as a form of resistance to human exploitation. This essay interrogates Elizabeth Costello's interpretation of animal silence by exploring the role of such silence in the construction of the human subject via its constitutive finitude. I consider three textual speaker/protagonists—Elizabeth Costello in The Lives of Animals, Derrida in The Animal that Therefore I Am, and David Lurie in Disgrace—who are interested, and even invested, in the relationship between the particular resistant potential of animal silence and their own mortality as autobiographically-speaking human beings. I argue that the intersection between nonhuman silence and human mortality should be understood through the concept of sacrifice, which, as my reading of Derrida demonstrates, destabilizes any interpretation of animal silence as autonomously resistant. Through this relationship between silence and sacrifice, I seek to resituate the ethics of Disgrace, and especially to decentre the speaking voice of David Lurie as the ethical heart of the narrative, presenting a significant revision to previous readings of the novel. While much critical attention has proposed that the seeming expansion of Lurie's sympathetic imagination in his interactions with dogs signals his development as an ethical being, my argument locates the ethic of the novel not in the speaking voice of David Lurie, but rather in the many significant silences, both human and animal, contained within the text.
References
Aaltola, E. (2010). Coetzee and Alternative Animal Ethics. In A. Leist & Singer, P. (Eds.) J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. New York: Columbia UP.
Agamben, G. (1991). Language and Death: The Place of Negativity. K. Pinkus and M. Hardt (Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Attridge, D. (2000). Age of Bronze, State of Grace: Music and Dogs in Coetzee's Disgrace. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 34(1), 98-121.
Barnard, R. & Coetzee, J. (2003). J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace and the South African Pastoral. Contemporary Literature, 44(2), 199-224.
Berger, J. (1980). About Looking. New York: Pantheon.
Boehmer, E. (2002). Not Saying Sorry, Not Speaking Pain: Gender Implications in Disgrace. Interventions, 4(3), 342-351.
Boehmer, E. (2006). Sorry, Sorrier, Sorriest: The Gendering of Contrition in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace. In J. Poyner, (Ed.), J.M. Coetzee and the Idea of the Public Intellectual. Athens OH: Ohio UP.
Calarco, M. (2008). Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia UP.
Coetzee, J. (2000). Disgrace. London: Vintage.
Coetzee, J. (1999). The Lives of Animals. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Derrida, J., & Mallet, M. (Ed.). (2008a). The Animal That Therefore I Am (D. Wills, Trans.). New York, Fordham UP.
Derrida, J. (1991). Eating Well or the Calculation of the Subject: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In E. Cadava, P. Connor, & J. Nancy (Eds.), Who Comes After the Subject? New York: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2008b). The Gift of Death and Literature in Secret (D. Wills, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donovan, J. (2004). Miracles of Creation: Animals in J.M. Coetzee's Work. Michigan Quarterly Review, 43(1), 78-93.
Durrant, S. (2006). J.M. Coetzee, Elizabeth Costello, and the Limits of the Sympathetic Imagination. In J. Poyner (Ed.), J.M. Coetzee and the Idea of the Public Intellectual. Athens OH: Ohio UP.
Geiger, I. (2010). Writing the Lives of Animals. In A. Leist & P. Singer (Eds.), J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. New York: Columbia UP.
Herron, T. (2005). The Dog Man: Becoming Animal in Coetzee's Disgrace. Twentieth Century Literature, 51(4), 467-490.
Hooper, M. (2010). Scenes from a dry imagination: Disgrace and Embarrassment. In G. Bradshaw & M. Neill (Eds.), J.M. Coetzee's Austerities. Farnham: Ashgate.
Jolly, R. (2006). Going to the Dogs: Humanity in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, The Lives of Animals, and South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In J. Poyner (Ed.), J.M. Coetzee and the Idea of the Public Intellectual. Athens OH: Ohio UP.
Lippit, A. (2000). Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marais, M. (2001). Impossible Possibilities: Ethics and Choice in J.M. Coetzee's The Lives of Animals and Disgrace. English Academy Review, 18(1), 1-20.
McDunnah, M. (2009). We are not asked to condemn: Sympathy, Subjectivity, and the Narration of Disgrace.” In B. McDonald (Ed.), Encountering 'Disgrace': Reading and Teaching Coetzee's Novel. Rochester: Camden House.
O'Neill, K. (2009). The Dispossession of David Lurie. In B. McDonald (Ed.), Encountering 'Disgrace': Reading and Teaching Coetzee's Novel. Rochester: Camden House.
Shukin, N. (2009). Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Singh, J. (2013). The Tail End of Disciplinarity. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 49(4), 470-482. van Heerden, A. (2010). Disgrace, Desire, and the Dark Side of the New South Africa. In A.
Leist and Singer, P. (Eds.), J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. New York: Columbia UP.
Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal Rites: American Culture, The Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, L. (2006). Writing “Out of All the Camps”: J.M. Coetzee's Narratives of Displacement. New York: Routledge.
Wright, L. (2010). David Lurie's Learning and the Meaning of J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace. In G. Bradshaw and M. Neill (Eds.), J.M. Coetzee's Austerities. Farnham: Ashgate.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales con ISSN 2346-920X se adhiere a las diferentes iniciativas que promueven el acceso libre al conocimiento, por lo que todos los contenidos de la misma son de acceso libre y gratuito y publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons, que permite su difusión pero impide la alteración de la obra e incluye siempre mención al autor/a y fuente.
Es decir, una licencia de tipo Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.
Por ello, los correos electrónicos de los autores se encontrarán a disposición de los lectores, en caso de que deseen contactarlos personalmente.