Animalomorphic Pedagogies:

deconstruction, perspectivism and multispecies stories

Authors

  • Moysés Pinto Neto

Keywords:

Animalomorphism, Perspectivism, Multinaturalism, Multispecies, Anthropocene

Abstract

From the space opened by deconstruction, paper tries to think about strategies of biology reincorporation, especially in the Donna Haraway’s thought, as a variation under strain of Amerindian perspectivism, allowing to distribute the agency between human and non-human animals. Thus, if in Amerindian perspectivism, as described by Viveiros de Castro, a combination of anthropomorphism (the attribute "person" or "people" is distributed depending on the position and not of a substance or essence) and metaphysics of predation (place of the human depends on the contingent position between hunting and hunter) predominates, Haraway presents other dimensions in which the example is animal (animalomorphism) and the relational structure is, for example, companion and sympoiesis. It is not just about metaphors, since the perspectivist multiverse does not contain an original, but a pragmatic of comparative morphdynamics that operate as animalomorphic pedagogies to survive in the Anthropocene.

Author Biography

  • Moysés Pinto Neto

    Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação da Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Doutor em Filosofia na Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul com período sanduíche no Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (Kingston – UK).

References

Referências

Benjamin, W. (1987). Experiência e Pobreza. In: Obras Escolhidas: Magia, técnica, arte e política, vol. 1. Brasília: Brasiliense.

Bonneuil, C., Fressoz, J-B. (2016). The Shock of the Anthropocene. Trad. David Fernbach. London/New York: Verso Books (edição Kindle).

Ciriza, A. (2006). A propósito de Jean Jacques Rousseau: contrato, educação e subjetividade. En publicacion: Filosofia política moderna. De Hobbes a Marx. Boron, Atilio A (ed.). CLACSO; DCP-FFLCH/USP, Universidade de São Paulo. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/praxis/429/filopolmpt.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Danowski, D., Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Há mundo por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins. Desterro [Florianópolis]: Cultura e Barbárie/Instituto Socioambiental.

Derrida, J. (1967). De la Grammatologie. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.

____ (2002) O animal que logo sou (a seguir). Trad. Fábio Landa. São Paulo: UNESP.

____ & Roudinesco, Elisabeth (2004). De que amanhã... diálogo. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

Graeber, D. (2015). Radical alterity is just anotherway of saying “reality”: a reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 1–41.

Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifest: dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

____ (2007). When species meet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

____ (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Latour, B. (2014). Para distinguir os amigos e inimigos no tempo do Antropoceno. Revista de Antropologia, São Paulo, USP, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 11-31.

___ (2017). Où aterrir. Paris: La Decouvert [edição kindle].

Ludueña Romandini, F. (2012). A comunidade dos espectros. I. Antropotecnia. Tradutores A. Nodari e L. D’Ávila de Oliveira. Desterro, Florianópolis: Cultura e Barbárie.

Nodari, A. (2018). Recipropriedade. En: Piseagrama. Belo Horizonte. Recuperado de: https://piseagrama.org/recipropriedade/.

Tsing, A. et al (2017). Arts of living in a damaged planet: ghosts and monsters in the Anthropocene. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (2011). A inconstância da alma selvagem. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.

___ (2015). Metafísicas Canibais: elementos para uma antropologia pós-estrutural. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.

___ (2014). Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? CUSAS Annual Marilyn Strathern Lecture, 30 May 2014. Recuperado de: https://sisu.ut.ee/sites/default/files/biosemio/files/cusas_strathern_lecture_2014.pdf

___ (2019) On Models and Examples: engineers and bricoleurs in the Anthropocene. Current Anthropology, v. 60, Supplement 20, pp. 296-308.

Published

2019-06-01

Issue

Section

SOBRE LOS ANIMALES: TESIS Y TESINAS

How to Cite

Animalomorphic Pedagogies: : deconstruction, perspectivism and multispecies stories. (2019). Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Críticos Animales, 6(1). https://revistaleca.org/index.php/leca/article/view/241