Ética e invertebrados:
análise dos casos dos cephalopods e echinoderms
Palavras-chave:
reflexão, dor, ética, animaisResumo
Existem diferentes posturas éticas em relação à natureza e aos seres vivos em particular. No entanto, essas posturas raramente consideram os invertebrados. Estes animais representam mais de 90% das espécies que habitam o nosso planeta. Muitas espécies de invertebrados são amplamente utilizadas em pesquisas científicas, posto que são relativamente fáceis de se reproduzir e de se manter sob as condições de laboratório. Isso os torna muito versáteis para serem usados como modelos biológicos de outras espécies animais, incluindo os humanos. No entanto, os graus de avanço da reflexão ética em torno da experimentação em invertebrados variam enormemente. Neste trabalho, nos concentramos em equinodermos e cefalópodes, dois grupos de animais que são evolutivamente muito distantes entre si e que possuem graus contrastantes de consideração moral pela sociedade de um modo geral e também por parte da comunidade científica. No entanto, os equinodermos se encontram, evolutivamente falando, mais próximos dos seres humanos do que os cefalópodes. É nossa intenção gerar uma reflexão responsável no leitor sobre os critérios atualmente utilizados para considerar quais animais devem ser considerados moralmente e propor um caminho alternativo.
Referências
Andrews, P. L., Darmaillacq, A. S., Dennison, N., Gleadall, I. G., Hawkins, P., Messenger, J. B., Osorio, D., Smith, J. & Smith, J. A. (2013). The identification and management of pain, suffering and distress in cephalopods, including anaesthesia, analgesia and humane killing. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 447, 46-64.
Arendt, D. (2008). The evolution of cell types in animals: emerging principles from molecular studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(11), 868.
Ayala, F. J. (1988). “Can progress be defined as a biological concept”. En M. H. Nitecki, (Ed.), Evolutionary progress (p. 75-96). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bateson, P. (1991). “Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour”, 42(5), 827-839.
Besson, J. M., Guilbaud, G., & Ollat, H. (1994). Nociceptors in animals. Peripheral Neurons in Nociception: Physio-pharmacological Aspects, 1.
Budelmann, B. U. (1995). “The cephalopod nervous system: what evolution has made of the molluscan design”. En O. Brendbach & W. Kutsch (Eds.), The nervous systems of invertebrates: An evolutionary and comparative approach (pp. 115-138). Birkhäuser Basel.
Brusca, R. C., Moore, W., & Schuster, M. (2016). Invertebrates. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associated. Inc Publishers.
Chandroo, K. P., Duncan, I. J., & Moccia, R. D. (2004). Can fish suffer? perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 86(3), 225-250.
Cheney, J., & Weston, A. (1999). Environmental ethics as environmental etiquette: Toward an ethics-based epistemology. Environmental Ethics, 21(2), 115-134.
Darmaillacq, A. S., Dickel, L., & Mather, J. (Eds.). (2014). Cephalopod cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
Della Rocca, G., Di Salvo, A., Giannettoni, G., & Goldberg, M. E. (2015). Pain and suffering in invertebrates: an insight on cephalopods. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 10(2), 77.
Edelman, D. B., & Seth, A. K. (2009). Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach. Trends in neurosciences, 32(9), 476-484.
Elliott, G. R., & Leys, S. P. (2007). Coordinated contractions effectively expel water from the aquiferous system of a freshwater sponge. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210(21), 3736-3748.
Elwood, R. W. (2011). Pain and suffering in invertebrates? Ilar Journal, 52(2), 175-184.
Flichman, E. H., & Abeledo, H. (1998). Las Raíces y Los Frutos Temas de Filosofía de la Ciencia. Buenos Aires: CCC Educando.
Gould, S. J. (1988). Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. Journal of Paleontology, 62(3), 319-329.
Griffin, D. R., & Speck, G. B. (2004). New evidence of animal consciousness. Animal cognition, 7(1), 5-18.
Guariglia, O., & Vidiella, G. (2013). Breviario de ética. Buenos Aires: EDHASA Argentina.
Hanlon, R. T., & Messenger, J. B. (2018). Cephalopod behaviour. Cambridge: University Press.
Hartestein, V. (2015). “Plathelminthes” (Excluding Neodermata). En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 74-93). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2008). Acoel development supports a simple planula-like urbilaterian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1496), 1493-1501.
Hinman, V. F., & Burke, R. D. (2018). Embryonic neurogenesis in echinoderms. WIREs Developmental Biology, 316, 1-15.
Holland, L. Z., Carvalho, J. E., Escriva, H., Laudet, V., Schubert, M., Shimeld, S. M., & Yu, J. K. (2013). Evolution of bilaterian central nervous systems: a single origin? EvoDevo, 4(1), 27.
Horridge, G. A. (2015). “Perspective—How to Write an Invertebrate Anatomy Book”. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 4-9). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Horvath, K., Angeletti, D., Nascetti, G., & Carere, C. (2013). Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 49, 9-17.
Jones, R. C. (2013). Science, sentience, and animal welfare. Biology & Philosophy, 28(1), 1-30.
Kandel, E. R., Kupfermann, I., & Iversen, S. (2001). Aprendizaje y memoria. En Kandel, J. Schwartz & T. Jessell. (Eds.). Principios de Neurociencia (p. 1227-1246). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Key, B. (2015). Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness. Biology & philosophy, 30(2), 149-165.
Leitz, T. (2015). Cnidaria. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 26-48). Oxford University Press.
Lewbart, G. A., & Mosley, C. (2012). Clinical anesthesia and analgesia in invertebrates. Journal of exotic pet medicine, 21(1), 59-70.
Martín García, J. A., & Luque-Escalona, A. (2008). Capacidad de retorno de Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Anales Universitarios de Etología, 2:125-131
Mashanov, V. S., Zueva, O. R., Heinzeller, T., & Dolmatov, I. Y. (2006). Ultrastructure of the circumoral nerve ring and the radial nerve cords in holothurians (Echinodermata). Zoomorphology, 125(1), 27-38.
Mashanov, V., Zueva, O., Rubilar, T., Epherra, L., García-Arrarás, J.E. (2015). “Echinodermata”. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 665-689). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Mather, J. A. (2008). Cephalopod consciousness: behavioural evidence. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 37-48.
Mather, J. A. (2016). An invertebrate perspective on pain. Animal Sentience: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Animal Feeling, 1(3), 12.
Mather, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (2007). Ethics and invertebrates: a cephalopod perspective. Diseases of aquatic organisms, 75(2), 119-129.
Metchnikoff, E. (1893). Lectures on the comparative pathology of inflammation: delivered at the Pasteur Institute in 1891. Рипол Классик.
Moledo, L., & Olszevicki, N. (2014). Historia de las ideas científicas: de Tales de Mileto a la Máquina de Dios. Buenos Aires: Planeta.
Moltschaniwskyj, N. A., Hall, K., Lipinski, M. R., Marian, J. E., Nishiguchi, M., Sakai, M. & Van Gelderen, R. (2007). Ethical and welfare considerations when using cephalopods as experimental animals. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 17(2-3), 455-476.
Nixon, M., & Young, J. Z. (2003). The brains and lives of cephalopods. Oxford University Press. Oxford
Pan, Y., Zhang, L., Lin, C., Sun, J., Kan, R., & Yang, H. (2015). Influence of flow velocity on motor behavior of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Physiology & behavior, 144, 52-59.
Paps, J., Baguna, J., & Riutort, M. (2009). Bilaterian phylogeny: a broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new Lophotrochozoa phylogeny and supports a paraphyletic basal Acoelomorpha. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26(10), 2397-2406.
Perl, E. (1988). ”Noci-Reception, nociceptors and pain”. En J.M. Wolfe (Ed). Sensory Systems II: Senses Other Than Vision, (p. 56-58). Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. Boston
Riebli, N., & Reichert, H. (2015). “Perspective – The first brain”. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 67-74). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Rubilar, T., & Crespi-Abril, A. (2017). Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? Revista de Biología Tropical, 65(1-1), 11-22.
Ruse, M. (2009). Monad to man: the concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press.
Schmidt-Rhaesa, A., Harzsch, S., & Purschke, G. (2015). “Introduction”. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 1-4). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Sherwin, C. M. (2001). Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Animal Welfare, 10(1), 103-118.
Singer, P. (2011). Liberación animal: el clásico definitivo del movimiento animalista. Buenos Aires: Santillana.
Stollewerk, A. (2015). “Perspective - Evolution in neurogenesis in arthropods. Open questions and future directions”. En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 492-499). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Vitti, J. J. (2013). Cephalopod cognition in an evolutionary context: implications for ethology. Biosemiotics, 6(3), 393-401.
Weston, A. (2009). The incompleat eco-philosopher: Essays from the edges of environmental ethics. Nueva York: SUNY Press.
Wollesen, T. (2015). “Mollusca: Cephalopoda” En A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, S. Harzsch & G. Purschke (Eds). Structure and Evolution of Invertebrate Nervous System, (p. 222-241). Oxford University Press. Oxford
Yoshimura, K., & Motokawa, T. (2008). Bilateral symmetry and locomotion: do elliptical regular sea urchins proceed along their longer body axis? Marine Biology, 154(5), 911-918.
Yoshimura, K., & Motokawa, T. (2010). Bilaterality in the regular sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina is related to efficient defense not to efficient locomotion. Marine biology, 157(11), 2475-2488.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales con ISSN 2346-920X se adhiere a las diferentes iniciativas que promueven el acceso libre al conocimiento, por lo que todos los contenidos de la misma son de acceso libre y gratuito y publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons, que permite su difusión pero impide la alteración de la obra e incluye siempre mención al autor/a y fuente.
Es decir, una licencia de tipo Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.
Por ello, los correos electrónicos de los autores se encontrarán a disposición de los lectores, en caso de que deseen contactarlos personalmente.
