A voz dos animais:
uma resposta a recente teoria francesa do cuidado na ética animal
Palavras-chave:
teoria feminista do cuidado, vegetarianismo, abatedourosResumo
Recentemente, teorias francesas têm contribuído com o feminismo americano atrelado à tradição do cuidado na ética animal. Algumas destas considerações são, no entanto, mal concebidas e permitem, por exemplo, a aprovação qualificada do consumo de carne, bem como a valorização de Temple Grandin e de Aldo Leopold como paradigmas da teoria do cuidado. As considerações francesas dão errado, sustenta a autora, pois elas falham no que concerne à incorporação, em suas deliberações éticas, da “voz da diferença” dos animais, a qual corresponde ao coração da teoria americana do cuidado animal. Escutar esta voz consiste em necessariamente se opor ao consumo da carne e à morte de animais em vista da utilidade humana (atitudes que, pelo contrário, são endossadas por Grandin e Leopold). Ao criticar os trabalhos franceses, a autora contribuí, refina e clarifica a teoria americana do cuidado atinente à ética animal.
Referências
Adams, C. J. (1991), The Sexual Politics of Meat, Continuum, New York.
Adorno, T. W. (2007), Negative Dialectics (1966), Continuum, New York.
Burgat, F. (2004), “Non-violencetowards Animals in the Thinking of Gandhi: The Problem of Animal Husbandry”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 14, pp. 223-48.
Chavel, S. (2012), “L’éthique animale: frontière de la justiceoufrontièredu care?”, in Sandra Laugier (Ed.) Tous vulnérables? Le “care” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 89-98.
Coetzee, J. M. (2003), Elizabeth Costello, Viking, New York.
Diamond, C. (1991), “EatingMeat and Eating People” (1978), in The RealisticSpirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 319-34.
________. (1991), “Anything but Argument?” (1982), in The RealisticSpirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 291-308.
________. (2008), “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy”, in Cavell, S. et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and Animal Life, Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 43-89.
Donovan, J. (2007), “AnimalRights and FeministTheory” (1990), in Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.) The Feminist Care Tradition in AnimalEthics, Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 58-86.
________. (2007), “Attention to Suffering: Sympathyas a Basis for Ethical Treatment ofAnimals” (1996), in Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition inAnimalEthics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 174-97.
________. (2006), “Feminism and the Treatment of Animals: From Care to Dialogue”,Signs, Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 305-29, A shortened version appears in (2007) Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 360-69.
________. (2009), “Tolstoy’s Animals”, Society and Animals, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 38-52. Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.) (2007), The Feminist Care Tradition in AnimalEthics, Continuum, New York.
Foer, J. (2009), Eating Animals, Little, Brown, New York.
Gaille, M. (2012), “De la ‘crise écologique’ au stade du miroir moral”, in Sandra Laugier (Ed.) Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, EditionsPayot&Rivage, Paris, pp. 205-32.
Gilligan, C. (2010), “Une voix différente: un regard prospectif à partir du passé”, in V. Nurock (Ed.) Carol Gilligan et l‘éthiquedu “care”,PressesUniversitaires de France, Paris, pp.19-38.
________. (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Grandin, T. (2001), “Welfare of Cattle during Slaughter and the Prevention of Nonambulatory (Downer) Cattle”, Journal of the Veterinary Medicine Association, Vol. 219, No. 10, pp.1377-82.
________ (2012), “Avoid Being Abstract When Making Policies on the Welfare of Animals”, in Dekoven, M. and Lundblad, M. (Eds.), Species Matters; Human Advocacy and Cultural Theory, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 195-217.
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1988), Dialectic of Enlightenment(1944), Continuum, NewYork.
Kheel, M. (1995), “License to Kill: an Ecofeminist Critique of Hunters’ Discourse”, in Adams, C. J. and Donovan, J. (Eds.), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 85-125.
Larrère, C. (2010), “Au-delà de l’humain: écofeminismes et éthique du care”, in V. Nurock (Ed.), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp.151-74.
Laugier, S. (Ed.) (2012), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, EditionsPayot&Rivage, Paris.
Le Goff, A. (2012), “Le care, le justerapport à l’animal sans voix”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris,pp. 33-64.
Leopold, A. (1966), A Sand County Almanac(1949), Ballantine, New York.
MacKinnon, C. A. (2007), “Of Mice and Men: A Fragment on Animal Rights”, in
Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 316-32.
Midgley, Mary (1983), Animals and Why They Matter, University of Georgia Press, Athens.
Molinier, P. (2012), “Cochons et humains: À propos d’une tension inhérente à nos façons detraiter les animaux”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 65-88.
Nurock, V. (Ed.) (2010), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Paperman, P. (2010), “La voix différente et la portée politique de l’éthique du care”, in Nurock,V. (Ed.), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp. 79-90.
Raïd, L. (2012), “De la Land Ethic aux éthiques du care”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 173-203.
Regan, T. (1983), The Case for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Singer, P. (1975), Animal Liberation, Avon, New York.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales con ISSN 2346-920X se adhiere a las diferentes iniciativas que promueven el acceso libre al conocimiento, por lo que todos los contenidos de la misma son de acceso libre y gratuito y publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons, que permite su difusión pero impide la alteración de la obra e incluye siempre mención al autor/a y fuente.
Es decir, una licencia de tipo Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.
Por ello, los correos electrónicos de los autores se encontrarán a disposición de los lectores, en caso de que deseen contactarlos personalmente.