The voice of animals:
a response to recent french care theory in animal ethics
Keywords:
feminist care theory, vegetarianism, abattoirsAbstract
Recent French theorists have expanded upon the American feminist care tradition in animal ethics. Some of these applications are, however, misconceived, allowing, for example, a qualified endorsement of meat-eating and the valorization of Temple Grandin and Aldo Leopold as exemplars of care theory. The French applications go awry, the author contends, because they fail to incorporate “the different voice” of animals in their ethical deliberations, which is at the heart of American animal care theory. Hearing that voice necessarily enjoins against meat-eating or killing animals for human use (both of which Grandin and Leopold endorse). In critiquing the French works the author expands upon, refines, and clarifies American care theory in animal ethics.
References
Adams, C. J. (1991), The Sexual Politics of Meat, Continuum, New York.
Adorno, T. W. (2007), Negative Dialectics (1966), Continuum, New York.
Burgat, F. (2004), “Non-violencetowards Animals in the Thinking of Gandhi: The Problem of Animal Husbandry”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 14, pp. 223-48.
Chavel, S. (2012), “L’éthique animale: frontière de la justiceoufrontièredu care?”, in Sandra Laugier (Ed.) Tous vulnérables? Le “care” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 89-98.
Coetzee, J. M. (2003), Elizabeth Costello, Viking, New York.
Diamond, C. (1991), “EatingMeat and Eating People” (1978), in The RealisticSpirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 319-34.
________. (1991), “Anything but Argument?” (1982), in The RealisticSpirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 291-308.
________. (2008), “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy”, in Cavell, S. et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and Animal Life, Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 43-89.
Donovan, J. (2007), “AnimalRights and FeministTheory” (1990), in Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.) The Feminist Care Tradition in AnimalEthics, Columbia University Press: New York, pp. 58-86.
________. (2007), “Attention to Suffering: Sympathyas a Basis for Ethical Treatment ofAnimals” (1996), in Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition inAnimalEthics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 174-97.
________. (2006), “Feminism and the Treatment of Animals: From Care to Dialogue”,Signs, Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 305-29, A shortened version appears in (2007) Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 360-69.
________. (2009), “Tolstoy’s Animals”, Society and Animals, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 38-52. Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.) (2007), The Feminist Care Tradition in AnimalEthics, Continuum, New York.
Foer, J. (2009), Eating Animals, Little, Brown, New York.
Gaille, M. (2012), “De la ‘crise écologique’ au stade du miroir moral”, in Sandra Laugier (Ed.) Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, EditionsPayot&Rivage, Paris, pp. 205-32.
Gilligan, C. (2010), “Une voix différente: un regard prospectif à partir du passé”, in V. Nurock (Ed.) Carol Gilligan et l‘éthiquedu “care”,PressesUniversitaires de France, Paris, pp.19-38.
________. (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Grandin, T. (2001), “Welfare of Cattle during Slaughter and the Prevention of Nonambulatory (Downer) Cattle”, Journal of the Veterinary Medicine Association, Vol. 219, No. 10, pp.1377-82.
________ (2012), “Avoid Being Abstract When Making Policies on the Welfare of Animals”, in Dekoven, M. and Lundblad, M. (Eds.), Species Matters; Human Advocacy and Cultural Theory, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 195-217.
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1988), Dialectic of Enlightenment(1944), Continuum, NewYork.
Kheel, M. (1995), “License to Kill: an Ecofeminist Critique of Hunters’ Discourse”, in Adams, C. J. and Donovan, J. (Eds.), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 85-125.
Larrère, C. (2010), “Au-delà de l’humain: écofeminismes et éthique du care”, in V. Nurock (Ed.), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp.151-74.
Laugier, S. (Ed.) (2012), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, EditionsPayot&Rivage, Paris.
Le Goff, A. (2012), “Le care, le justerapport à l’animal sans voix”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris,pp. 33-64.
Leopold, A. (1966), A Sand County Almanac(1949), Ballantine, New York.
MacKinnon, C. A. (2007), “Of Mice and Men: A Fragment on Animal Rights”, in
Donovan, J. and Adams, C. J. (Eds.), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 316-32.
Midgley, Mary (1983), Animals and Why They Matter, University of Georgia Press, Athens.
Molinier, P. (2012), “Cochons et humains: À propos d’une tension inhérente à nos façons detraiter les animaux”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 65-88.
Nurock, V. (Ed.) (2010), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Paperman, P. (2010), “La voix différente et la portée politique de l’éthique du care”, in Nurock,V. (Ed.), Carol Gilligan et l‘éthique du “care”, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp. 79-90.
Raïd, L. (2012), “De la Land Ethic aux éthiques du care”, in Laugier, S. (Ed.), Tous vulnérables? Le “care,” les animaux et l’environnement, Editions Payot & Rivage, Paris, pp. 173-203.
Regan, T. (1983), The Case for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Singer, P. (1975), Animal Liberation, Avon, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales con ISSN 2346-920X se adhiere a las diferentes iniciativas que promueven el acceso libre al conocimiento, por lo que todos los contenidos de la misma son de acceso libre y gratuito y publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons, que permite su difusión pero impide la alteración de la obra e incluye siempre mención al autor/a y fuente.
Es decir, una licencia de tipo Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.
Por ello, los correos electrónicos de los autores se encontrarán a disposición de los lectores, en caso de que deseen contactarlos personalmente.