Dos movimientos y continuidad humana-animal:
Posiciones, suposiciones, contradicciones.
Abstract
This article is about the images, representations, and treatment of animals in two movements: the animal welfare/rights/liberation movement - the animal movement for short - and the deep green/deep ecology movement. More specifically it wants to look at the way in which each of these movements comes to terms with - or fails to come to terms with - the natural continuity existing between animals and humans.
No matter how each movement is typified, any definition will contain some form of generalization. This is inevitable since there are people, among them ecofeminists (Warren 1994), who would define themselves as animal advocates as well as deep green.
References
Aslin, H.J. & Bennett, D.H. (2000) ‘Wildlife and world views: Australian attitudes toward wildlife’. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 5 (2) 15-35.
Baird Callicott, J.(1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Baird Callicott, J. Animal liberation and environmental ethics: back together again. in Hargrove, E.C. editor. (1992). The animal rights/environmental ethics debate: The Environmental perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press, 249-261.
Bell, G. (2001). The poison principle: Sydney: Picador Pan MacMillan Australia.
Birke, L & Michael, M. (1998). ‘The heart of the matter: Animal bodies, ethics and species boundaries’. Society & Animals. 6 (3) 245- 262.
Braunstein, M. M. (1998). ‘Roadkill: Driving animals to their graves’. Animal Issues, 29 (3).
Cartmill, M. (1993). A view to a death in the morning: Hunting and nature through history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dunayer, J. (2001). Animal equality: Language and liberation. Derwood: Ryce Publishing.
Flynn, C.P. (2002).‘Hunting and illegal violence against humans and other animals: exploring the relationship’. Society & Animals. 10 (2) 137-154.
Francione, G.L. (1996) Rain without thunder: the ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hay, P. (2002) Main currents in western environmental thought. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Lemaire, T. (2002). Met open zinnen: Natuur, landschap, aarde. Amsterdam: Ambo.
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1984). Tristes tropiques. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Livingston, J.A.(1994). Rogue primate: An exploration of human domestication. Toronto: Key Porter.
Low, T. (1999). Feral future. Ringwood: Penguin Books Australia.
Midgley, M. (1983). Animals and why they matter. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Montgomery, C. (2000). Blood relations: Animals, humans, and politics. Toronto: Between the Lines.
Noske, B. (1994). ‘Animals and the green movement: A view from the Netherlands’. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, A Journal of Socialist Ecology.5 (4) 85-94.
Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Plumwood, V. Being prey. in Rothenberg, D & Ulvaeus M. editors. (1999) . The New Earth Reader: The best of Terra Nova. Cambridge: MIT Press. 76-92.
Quain, A. (2002). ‘Improving their bodies, improving our bodies’. Artlink, Contemporary Art Quarterly, theme issue The improved body: animals & humans. 22 (1) 33-37.
Reads, J.L. (2003) Red sand, green heart: Ecological adventures in the outback. South Melbourne: Lothian Books.
Regan, T. (1983) The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rollin, B. (1995). The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rolls, E.. (1969). They all ran wild. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
Sabloff, A. (2001). Reordering the natural world: Humans and animals in the city. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Serpell, J. (1986). In the company of animals: A study in human-animal relationships. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Shepard, P. (1996). The others: How animals made us human. Washington DC: Island Press.
Singer, P. (1990 second edition). Animal liberation. London: Jonathan Cape.
Soulé, M.E & Lease, G. editors. (1995). Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction. Washington DC: Island Press.
Tuan, Y. (1984). Dominance and affection: The making of pets. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Warren, K. editor. (1994). Ecological feminism. London and New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
La Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales con ISSN 2346-920X se adhiere a las diferentes iniciativas que promueven el acceso libre al conocimiento, por lo que todos los contenidos de la misma son de acceso libre y gratuito y publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons, que permite su difusión pero impide la alteración de la obra e incluye siempre mención al autor/a y fuente.
Es decir, una licencia de tipo Atribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada.
Por ello, los correos electrónicos de los autores se encontrarán a disposición de los lectores, en caso de que deseen contactarlos personalmente.
