Food Ethics

Moral considerations about meat consumption

Authors

  • Paula Cristina Mira Bohórquez

Keywords:

moral, large-scale actions, consumption, exploitation, virtues, responsibility

Abstract

The article reflects on meat consumption and dairy products in the current industrialized societies of the 21st century, and evaluates the individual meat consumption habits that support the cruel factory farm industry. In the global food system, all elements are valued just in terms of their economic usefulness and animals are treated as commodities. My aim is to analyze the moral issues of individual actions that contribute to animal exploitation. In order to conduct my analysis, I will follow these steps: 1) Introduction; 2) Definition of carnism; 3) Analysis of large-scale actions; 4) Evaluation of the link between large-scale actions and animal suffering; 5) Considerations about the moral issues of large-scale actions; 6) Analysis of the difference between welfarism and abolitionism; 7) Reflections on the link between meat consumption, large-scale actions, and virtues.

Author Biography

  • Paula Cristina Mira Bohórquez

    Doctora en Filosofía Univeristët Mannheim (Alemania). Instituto de Filosofía Universidad de Antioquia (Colombia)

References

Adams, C. J. (1991). Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals. Hypatia, 6, 1, pp. 125-145.

Bekoff, M., & Pierce, J. (2017). The animals' agenda: Freedom, compassion, and coexistence in the Human Age. Boston: Beacon Press.

Boyd, D. R. (2017). Rights of nature: A legal revolution that could save the world. Toronto: ECW Press.

Di Paola, M. (2015). Cambiamento climatico: Una piccola introduzione. Milano: Luiss University Press.

Dombrowski, D. (2004) A Very Brief History of Philosophical Vegetarianism and Its Influence. En: Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat (Contemporary Issues). Amherst, New York: Prometheus Book.

Francione, G. L., & Charlton, A. E. (2015). Eat like you care: An examination of the morality of eating animals. Kentucky: Exempla Press.

Francione, G. L. (2007). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog? Philadelphia: Temple UniversityPress.

Hoekstra, A. (2017). The Water Foot Printo on Animal Production. En: D´Silva, J. y Webster, J, The Meat Crisis: Developing more Sustainable and Ethical Production and Consumption (Earthscan Food and Agriculture). London and New York: Routledge.

Joy, M. (2011). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism: the belief system that enables us to eat some animals and not others. Berkeley, Calif.: Conari.

Poore, J. y Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food´s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, vol. 1, pp. 987-992.

Position of the American Dietetic Association (2009). Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109, pp. 1266-1282.

Puleo, G. A. H. (2016). Ecofeminismo para otro mundo posible. Madrid: Cátedra.

Regan, T. (2010). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ricard, M. (2016). A plea for the animals: The moral, philosophical, and evolutionary imperative to treat all beings with compassion. Colorado: Shambhala Publications.

Sandler, R. L. (2015). Food ethics: The basics. Oxfordshire, England: Routledge.

Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Vahman, D., Comero. S. et al. (2018). The water footprint of different diets within European sub-national geographical entities. Nature Sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 518–525.

Wolf, U. (2012). Ethik der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-01

Issue

Section

¿EL ANIMALISMO INSTITUYE SU PROPIO DERECHO?

How to Cite

Food Ethics: Moral considerations about meat consumption. (2018). Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Críticos Animales, 5(2). https://revistaleca.org/index.php/leca/article/view/228