Cuidado atento para la liberación de las palomas bravías y más allá

Maria Martelli; Julieta Campos

doi:10.65530/shw8pd44

Autores

Maria Martelli
Julieta Campos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65530/shw8pd44

Palavras-chave:

cuidado atento, pombos ferais, libertação total

Resumo

Neste artigo, acompanho as formas pelas quais as relações entre pombos e humanos podem ser reconceitualizadas, passando da exploração e invisibilização para uma convivência cuidadosa. Projetar espaços e cuidar dos pombos pode ser um caminho para a libertação animal e para cidades multiespécie. Proponho o conceito de cuidado atento como guia: um cuidado que aprende fazendo, atende ao chamado dos outros e engaja-se em um antropomorfismo crítico. Um exemplo específico é o pombal (contraceptivo), uma arquitetura problemática, porém familiar, tanto para humanos quanto para pombos. As relações que ele convoca poderiam libertar os pombos das violências e marginalizações (infra)estruturais atuais e abrir novas discussões e práticas de cuidado voltadas à libertação (total), se conduzidas sob um ethos antiespecista e feminista.

Biografia do Autor

Maria Martelli

Escritora y activista-académica que trabaja en la intersección entre las teorías feministas y antiespecistas. Tiene una Maestría en Investigación Social Avanzada por la Facultad de Sociología y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Babeș-Bolyai, en Rumania, cuya tesis critica el modo en que el antropocentrismo configura los objetivos de educación para el desarrollo sustentable. Es parte del proyecto just wondering… donde participa en la creación de video-ensayos antiespecistas y cortometrajes. Sus publicaciones más recientes son: “Relationality, Not Universality: A Dialogue on Solidarity Across Movements, Borders and Species”, en conjunto con Nóra Ugron y Veda Popovici, en Matters: Journal of New Materialist Research; y el capítulo “’A Communion of Worlds’ Vegan Anarchist Visions in Speculative Fiction & Queer Ecological Poetry from Romania”, junto con Nóra Ugron, en Veganarchism: Making Veganism and Anarchism Dangerous Again. Maria fue asistente de producción para el Student Journal of Vegan Sociology.

Referências

Adams, C. J., & Donovan, J. (Eds.). (2007). The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader. Columbia University Press.

Amir, F. (2020). Being and Swine: The End of Nature (As We Knew It). Trad.: C. Russell. Between the Lines.

Arcari, P., Probyn-Rapsey, F., & Singer, H. (2021). Where Species Don’t Meet: Invisibilized Animals, Urban Nature and City Limits. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), pp. 940–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620939870

Arcari, P., Probyn-Rapsey, F., & Singer, H. (2022). Violent Architecture. Architect (Architect Victoria), 3a. edición, pp. 72–76. https://www.architecture.com.au/vicchapter/architect-victoria-design-for-all-life-architecture-and-planning

Arruzza, C., Bhattacharya, T., & Fraser, N. (2019). Feminism for the 99%: A Manifesto. Verso Books.

Balzano, A. (2021). Per farla finita con la famiglia: Dall’aborto alle parentele postumane. Meltemi Editore.

Blattner, C. E. (2020). From Zoonosis to Zoopolis. Derecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies, 11(4), p. 41. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.524

Borsellino, L. (2016). Animali liminali in città: Spazi, resistenza e convivenza. Liberazioni, 27, pp. 43–57.

Celermajer, D., & O’Brien, A. T. (2021). Alter-Transitional Justice; Transforming Unjust Relations with the More-than-Human. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 12, pp. 125–147.

Cole, M., & Stewart, K. (2014). Our Children and Other Animals: The Cultural Construction of Human – Animal Relations in Childhood (1a. edición). Routledge.

Cudworth, E. (2011). Social Lives with Other Animals: Tales of Sex, Death and Love. Palgrave Macmillan.

Dobeic, M., Pintari, Š., Vlahović, K., & Dovč, A. (2011). Feral Pigeon (Columba livia) Population Management in Ljubljana. VETERINARSKI ARHIV, 81(2), pp. 285– 298.

Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford University Press.

Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2015). Farmed Animal Sanctuaries: The Heart of the Movement? Politics and Animals, 1(1), p. 25.

Escobar, M. P. (2014). The Power of (Dis) Placement: Pigeons and Urban Regeneration in Trafalgar Square. Cultural Geographies, 21(3), pp. 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013500223

Foucault, M. (1984). Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuite, 2 de octubre, pp. 1–9 (“Des Espaces Autres,” marzo de 1967, traducido al inglés por Jay Miskowiec).

Franco-Barrera, A., & Fernández-Mateo, J. (2021). Expressions of Animal Ethics: Animal Sanctuaries, the Case of Spain [Conferencia]. EACAS Conference on Appraising Critical Animal Studies, 24–25 de junio, en línea, Universidad Edge Hill. https://youtu.be/UCw-AApI4oA

Gaarder, E. (2011). Where the Boys Aren’t: The Predominance of Women in Animal Rights Activism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), pp. 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2011.0019

Gering, E., Incorvaia, D., Henriksen, R., Conner, J., Getty, T., & Wright, D. (2019). Getting Back to Nature: Feralization in Animals and Plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(12), pp. 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.018

Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Lantern Books.

Haag-Wackernagel, D. (1993). Street Pigeons in Basel. Nature, 361, p. 200.

Haag-Wackernagel, D. (2004). Health Hazards Posed by Feral Pigeons. Journal of Infection, 48(4), pp. 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2003.11.001

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucen. Duke University Press. [edición en español: Haraway, D. (2019). Seguir con el problema. Generar parentesco en el Chthuluceno. Trad. de Helen Torres. consonni].

Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2018). Make Kin, Not Cities! Multispecies Entanglements and ‘Becoming-World’ in Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 17(2), pp. 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042

Ivana, M. (2023). The Contraceptive Dovecote – a Coexistence Experiment. Asociatia Culturala Contrasens. www.accontrasens.ro/artsens articles/thecontraceptive-dovecote-a-coexistence-experiment/

Ivancheva, M., & Keating, K. (2020). Revisiting Precarity, with Care: Productive and Reproductive Labour in the Era of Flexible Capitalism. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 20(4), pp. 251–282.

Jerolmack, C. (2008). How Pigeons Became Rats: The Cultural-Spatial Logic of Problem Animals. Social Problems, 55(1), pp. 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2008.55.1.72

Jerolmack, C. (2013). The Global Pigeon. University of Chicago Press.

Jiguet, F., Sunnen, L., Prévot, A.-C., & Princé, K. (2019). Urban Pigeons Losing Toes Due to Human Activities. Biological Conservation, 240, 108241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108241

Johnston, R. F., & Janiga, M. (1995). Feral Pigeons. Oxford University Press.

Kimmerer, R. W. (2015). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions.

Marchesini, R. (2016). Animals of the City. Angelaki, 21(1), pp. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2016.1163825

Martelli, M. (2022). Despre porumbei și oameni. În căutarea unei responsabilități non-antropocentrice. Iscoada. Disponible en: https://iscoada.com/text/despre-porumbei sioameni-in-cautarea-unei-responsabilitati-non-antropocentrice/

Miklósi, A. (2015). Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition. Oxford University Press.

Nor, A. (2022). Inamicii economiei socialiste, intrușii civilizației occidentale. Gând

vagabond. Disponible en : https://aronnor.ro/inamicii-economiei-socialiste-intrusii-civilizatieioccidentale

Ouellette-Dubé, M. (2022). What Are Good Multispecies Relations? An Analysis Through the Concept of Caring Relations. In E. Cudworth, R. E. McKie, & D. Turgoose (Eds.), Feminist Animal Studies: Theories, Practices, Politics (pp. 35–49). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003222620

Palmer, C. (2003). Placing Animals in Urban Environmental Ethics. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(1), pp. 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9833.00165

Pellow, D. N. (2014). Total Liberation: The Power and Promise of Animal Rights and the Radical Earth Movement. University of Minnesota Press.

People for Pigeons. (2008). Safe-Feeding Zones for Pigeons. https://peopleforpigeons.blogspot.com/2008/09/safe-feeding-zones-forpigeons.

Probyn-Rapsey, F. (2016). Five Propositions on Ferals. Feral Feminisms, 6, pp. 18–21.

Sanbomatsu, J. (2018). Lady Macbeth at the Rotisserie: ‘Femivores,’ Violence, and the New Maternalism in Animal Agriculture [Ponencia]. UPC’s Seventh Annual Conscious Eating Conference: What Are the Most Compassionate Choices? 10 de marzo. Disponible en: www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFRT4W6KHPk

Scotton, G. (2019). Taming Technologies: Crowd Control, Animal Control and the Interspecies Politics of Mobility. Parallax, 25(4), pp. 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2020.1731004

Shingne, M. C. (2020). The More-than-Human Right to the City: A Multispecies Reevaluation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 44, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1734014

Shir-Vertesh, D. (2012). “Flexible Personhood”: Loving Animals as Family Members in Israel. American Anthropologist, 114(3), pp. 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x

Taylor, N., Fraser, H., & Signal, T. (2022). ‘Rescued and Loved’ Women, Animal Sanctuaries, and Feminism. In E. Cudworth, R. E. McKie, & D. Turgoose (Eds.), Feminist Animal Studies: Theories, Practices, Politics (pp. 218–234). Routledge.

Taylor, S. (2017). Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation. New Press.

Teo, M. (2018). Unpleasant Design: The Rise of the Silently Hostile City. Azure Magazine. Disponible en: www.azuremagazine.com/article/unpleasant-design-hostilearchitecture/

Timeto, F. (2020). Bestiario Haraway: Per un Femminismo Multispecie. Mimesis Edizioni.

Westerlaken, M. (2019). It Matters What Designs Design Designs: Speculations on Multispecies Worlds [Ponencia]. WUD Silesia conference in Katowice, Polonia, noviembre. Disponible en: https://michellewesterlaken.com/2020/04/22/itmatters-what-designs-design-designs/

Westerlaken, M. (2021). What Is the Opposite of Speciesism? On Relational Care Ethics and Illustrating Multi-Species-Isms. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(3/4), pp. 522–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2019-0176

Weyrather, A. (2021). Basics for an Efficient, Animal Welfare-Friendly City Pigeon Management in (Large) Cities in Germany. A manual for practical implementation. Menschen für Tierrechte – Bundesverband der Tierversuchsgegner e.V. (People for Animal Rights – Asociación federal de personas que se oponen a la experimentación animal, registrada como ONG).

Wolch, J. (2002). Anima Urbis. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), pp. 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph400oa

Wrenn, C. (2022). Building a Vegan Feminist Network in the Professionalised Digital Age of Third-Wave Animal Activism. In E. Cudworth, R. E. McKie, & D. Turgoose (Eds.), Feminist Animal Studies: Theories, Practices, Politics (pp. 235–248). Routledge.